By Moisés Naim

Repsol “pursued a policy of pillage, not of production, not of exploration”, the Argentine president thundered on Monday. “They practically made the country unviable with their business policies, not resource policies.” Such was Cristina Fernández’s sulphurous stance as she announced her government was renationalising YPF, the country’s largest oil group.

There are of course many convoluted reasons behind the Argentine government’s contentious decision to reverse the privatisation of a few years ago. But objective observers will agree that this was not part of an overarching development strategy, nor a manifestation of resource nationalism – nor indeed any other carefully crafted initiative forming part of a broader design. Rather, cronyism, rifts between rival oligarchs, political expediency, populism and the wish to please a public resentful of the privatisations of the 1990s all played into the decision.

Given Argentina’s record with nationalisations, there is widespread scepticism that the government will run YPF efficiently. In the past decade, the Buenos Aires water company, the national airline, Aerolíneas Argentinas and several electricity companies that had been privatised in the 1990s have been renationalised with politically charged arguments similar to those used to justify YPF’s takeover.

As Jorge Colina, an economist at the Institute of Argentine Social Development in Buenos Aires, explained to the journalist Charles Newbery, these government-run companies are accumulating colossal losses. Last year the state subsidy for them was 80 per cent larger than the spending on a child welfare programme.

Perhaps one of the most surprising and permanent traits of Argentina’s politics is what I would call a systemic learning disability. The public and Argentina’s leaders seem unable to learn from past experience. Ms Fernández’s brand of populism is not new in Argentina and has a well-known legacy of failure. Yet the same policies known to have failed in the past are still alluring for voters. And politicians such as Ms Fernández are more than happy to exploit the public’s thirst for initiatives that promise to restore the success that once defined their nation – even if the promises never materialise and the country has suffered from a long decline only interrupted by periodic booms that usually end in tears, or busts. Read more…

The writer is senior associate in the international economics programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

As published in www.ft.com on April 18, 2012.


No comments yet.

Leave a Comment


We use both our own and third-party cookies to enhance our services and to offer you the content that most suits your preferences by analysing your browsing habits. Your continued use of the site means that you accept these cookies. You may change your settings and obtain more information here. Accept